What this example shows
A nominal balance can look much larger than the real outcome because inflation compounds every year. In this scenario, $100,000 grows in nominal terms, but the purchasing-power result is closer to $289,758.99.
This makes the example useful for long-term goals where future living costs matter more than the raw account statement.
In a retirement context, the inflation-adjusted figure is usually the more relevant one, since future spending needs are also affected by rising prices.
How to interpret the gap
The difference of about $1,810,486.18 is not money literally removed from the account. It is the reduction in what those future dollars can buy compared with today.
That is why retirement and long-horizon investing plans usually need both nominal and inflation-adjusted views before the result is actionable.
How to use the result
Use this example as a benchmark, then test your own starting balance, time horizon, and inflation assumptions in the full calculator. Comparing a few inflation scenarios is usually more informative than relying on one single rate.
If recurring contributions matter, pair this page with the Investment Growth Calculator or related worked examples.