What this example shows
This scenario isolates the math behind a high school final stretch saving for college. The ending balance reflects both the amount contributed and the compounding effect of leaving prior gains invested.
Because the same assumed return is applied every month, the path is smoother than real markets. The point of the example is to show sensitivity to starting balance, contribution size, return assumptions, and time horizon against a fixed target cost.
Assumptions and limitations
The example assumes $750.00 contributed every month, full reinvestment, and a constant 5% annual return with monthly compounding. It does not include taxes, fees, financial aid, or periods of negative returns.
The $140,000.00 target cost is treated as fixed. If your real target should grow with education inflation, adjust it separately before comparing it with this projection.
How families use a projection like this
Use the result as a benchmark, then test more conservative and more optimistic cases in the main calculator. Changing one assumption at a time makes it easier to see whether starting balance, contribution size, or time horizon matters most for reaching the target.
A projected surplus is not a guarantee, and a projected shortfall does not mean a plan has failed — both are simplified projections meant to guide how much to contribute, not a promise of the actual balance at enrollment.